The Petition Project, a challenge by over 31,000 scientists to the Global Warming Scam

http://www.petitionproject.org


http://www.petitionproject.org/gw_article/GWReview_OISM150.pdf



The Deniers - a Ten Part Series by Global Warming Skeptics

http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/story.html?id=22003a0d-37cc-4399-8bcc-39cd20bed2f6&k=0


Global Warming Doomsday called off:


http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3309910462407994295&q=doomsday+called+off

1) The Ice Core data shows we are living in the coldest 700 years of the current 10,000 year long interglacial period.

2) The Holocene Maximum was on average 6 to 8 degrees warmer than now, and it was like that for 7 to 8 thousand years, only the last 2000 years has it been getting cooler. And during the Holocene Maximum the world didn't come to a fiery end, the ice in Antarctica didn't melt, the polar bears didn't go extinct and the sea levels didn't rise 23 feet in 5 seconds.

3) With the last 700 years being the coldest in the past 10,000 years.

4) The myth that the Antarctic will melt with only a 0.5 degree C rise in temperature. Even if the Global Average temperature rose by 10 degrees it would still be more than 100 degrees below zero in the Antarctic. Ice doesn't melt at temperatures below -100 degrees.

5) Even if it got to +100 degrees every day in the Antarctic, it would still take between 2000 to 3000 years to melt all of the ice in Antarctica.
.


IPCC scientists who refute the report and say that man made global warming science is not settled or outright fabrication


Dr. Ian D. Clark, professor, isotope hydrogeology and paleoclimatology, Dept. of Earth Sciences, University of Ottawa

Dr. Tad Murty, former senior research scientist, Dept. of Fisheries and Oceans, former director of Australia’s National Tidal Facility and professor of earth sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide; currently adjunct professor, Departments of Civil Engineering and Earth Sciences, University of Ottawa

Dr. R. Timothy Patterson, professor, Dept. of Earth Sciences (paleoclimatology), Carleton University, Ottawa

Dr. Fred Michel, director, Institute of Environmental Science and associate professor, Dept. of Earth Sciences, Carleton University, Ottawa

Dr. Madhav Khandekar, former research scientist, Environment Canada. Member of editorial board of Climate Research and Natural Hazards

Dr. Paul Copper, FRSC, professor emeritus, Dept. of Earth Sciences, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ont.

Dr. Ross McKitrick, associate professor, Dept. of Economics, University of Guelph, Ont.

Dr. Tim Ball, former professor of climatology, University of Winnipeg; environmental consultant

Dr. Andreas Prokoph, adjunct professor of earth sciences, University of Ottawa; consultant in statistics and geology

Mr. David Nowell, M.Sc. (Meteorology), fellow of the Royal Meteorological Society, Canadian member and past chairman of the NATO Meteorological Group, Ottawa

Dr. Christopher Essex, professor of applied mathematics and associate director of the Program in Theoretical Physics, University of Western Ontario, London, Ont.

Dr. Gordon E. Swaters, professor of applied mathematics, Dept. of Mathematical Sciences, and member, Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Research Group, University of Alberta

Dr. L. Graham Smith, associate professor, Dept. of Geography, University of Western Ontario, London, Ont.

Dr. G. Cornelis van Kooten, professor and Canada Research Chair in environmental studies and climate change, Dept. of Economics, University of Victoria

Dr. Petr Chylek, adjunct professor, Dept. of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax

Dr./Cdr. M. R. Morgan, FRMS, climate consultant, former meteorology advisor to the World Meteorological Organization. Previously research scientist in climatology at University of Exeter, U.K.

Dr. Keith D. Hage, climate consultant and professor emeritus of Meteorology, University of Alberta

Dr. David E. Wojick, P.Eng., energy consultant, Star Tannery, Va., and Sioux Lookout, Ont.

Rob Scagel, M.Sc., forest microclimate specialist, principal consultant, Pacific Phytometric Consultants, Surrey, B.C.

Dr. Douglas Leahey, meteorologist and air-quality consultant, Calgary

Paavo Siitam, M.Sc., agronomist, chemist, Cobourg, Ont.

Dr. Chris de Freitas, climate scientist, associate professor, The University of Auckland, N.Z.

Dr. Richard S. Lindzen, Alfred P. Sloan professor of meteorology, Dept. of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Dr. Freeman J. Dyson, emeritus professor of physics, Institute for Advanced Studies, Princeton, N.J.

Mr. George Taylor, Dept. of Meteorology, Oregon State University; Oregon State climatologist; past president, American Association of State Climatologists

Dr. Ian Plimer, professor of geology, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Adelaide; emeritus professor of earth sciences, University of Melbourne, Australia

Dr. R.M. Carter, professor, Marine Geophysical Laboratory, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia

Mr. William Kininmonth, Australasian Climate Research, former Head National Climate Centre, Australian Bureau of Meteorology; former Australian delegate to World Meteorological Organization Commission for Climatology, Scientific and Technical Review

Dr. Hendrik Tennekes, former director of research, Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute

Dr. Gerrit J. van der Lingen, geologist/paleoclimatologist, Climate Change Consultant, Geoscience Research and Investigations, New Zealand

Dr. Patrick J. Michaels, professor of environmental sciences, University of Virginia

Dr. Nils-Axel Morner, emeritus professor of paleogeophysics & geodynamics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden

Dr. Gary D. Sharp, Center for Climate/Ocean Resources Study, Salinas, Calif.

Dr. Roy W. Spencer, principal research scientist, Earth System Science Center, The University of Alabama, Huntsville

Dr. Al Pekarek, associate professor of geology, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Dept., St. Cloud State University, St. Cloud, Minn.

Dr. Marcel Leroux, professor emeritus of climatology, University of Lyon, France; former director of Laboratory of Climatology, Risks and Environment, CNRS

Dr. Paul Reiter, professor, Institut Pasteur, Unit of Insects and Infectious Diseases, Paris, France. Expert reviewer, IPCC Working group II, chapter 8 (human health)

Dr. Zbigniew Jaworowski, physicist and chairman, Scientific Council of Central Laboratory for Radiological Protection, Warsaw, Poland

Dr. Sonja Boehmer-Christiansen, reader, Dept. of Geography, University of Hull, U.K.; editor, Energy & Environment

Dr. Hans H.J. Labohm, former advisor to the executive board, Clingendael Institute (The Netherlands Institute of International Relations) and an economist who has focused on climate change

Dr. Lee C. Gerhard, senior scientist emeritus, University of Kansas, past director and state geologist, Kansas Geological Survey

Dr. Asmunn Moene, past head of the Forecasting Centre, Meteorological Institute, Norway

Dr. August H. Auer, past professor of atmospheric science, University of Wyoming; previously chief meteorologist, Meteorological Service (MetService) of New Zealand

Dr. Vincent Gray, expert reviewer for the IPCC and author of The Greenhouse Delusion: A Critique of ‘Climate Change 2001,’ Wellington, N.Z.

Dr. Howard Hayden, emeritus professor of physics, University of Connecticut

Dr Benny Peiser, professor of social anthropology, Faculty of Science, Liverpool John Moores University, U.K.

Dr. Jack Barrett, chemist and spectroscopist, formerly with Imperial College London, U.K.

Dr. William J.R. Alexander, professor emeritus, Dept. of Civil and Biosystems Engineering, University of Pretoria, South Africa. Member, United Nations Scientific and Technical Committee on Natural Disasters, 1994-2000

Dr. S. Fred Singer, professor emeritus of environmental sciences, University of Virginia; former director, U.S. Weather Satellite Service

Dr. Harry N.A. Priem, emeritus professor of planetary geology and isotope geophysics, Utrecht University; former director of the Netherlands Institute for Isotope Geosciences; past president of the Royal Netherlands Geological & Mining Society

Dr. Robert H. Essenhigh, E.G. Bailey professor of energy conversion, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, The Ohio State University

Dr. Sallie Baliunas, astrophysicist and climate researcher, Boston, Mass.

Douglas Hoyt, senior scientist at Raytheon (retired) and co-author of the book The Role of the Sun in Climate Change; previously with NCAR, NOAA, and the World Radiation Center, Davos, Switzerland

Dipl.-Ing. Peter Dietze, independent energy advisor and scientific climate and carbon modeller, official IPCC reviewer, Bavaria, Germany

Dr. Boris Winterhalter, senior marine researcher (retired), Geological Survey of Finland, former professor in marine geology, University of Helsinki, Finland

Dr. Wibjorn Karlen, emeritus professor, Dept. of Physical Geography and Quaternary Geology, Stockholm University, Sweden

Dr. Hugh W. Ellsaesser, physicist/meteorologist, previously with the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Calif.; atmospheric consultant.

Dr. Art Robinson, founder, Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine, Cave Junction, Ore.

Dr. Arthur Rorsch, emeritus professor of molecular genetics, Leiden University, The Netherlands; past board member, Netherlands organization for applied research (TNO) in environmental, food and public health

Dr. Alister McFarquhar, Downing College, Cambridge, U.K.; international economist

Dr. Richard S. Courtney, climate and atmospheric science consultant, IPCC expert reviewer, U.K.

------CLIMATE CONTROL MEETINGS---------


If, as Al Gorians insist with such mind-numbing frequency, global warming is so dangerous to the world, and if, as Al Gorians endlessly pontificate, we must reduce man-made carbon dioxide emissions 80% by 2050, why then are all these environmental extremists flying around the world by the tens of thousands? Why aren't they videoconferencing instead, and practicing what they preach?


- Rio De Janeiro "Earth Summit Conference" June 3-14, 1992

- Kyoto, Japan Dec 11, 1997 (Delegates from 160 nations)

- Halifax, Canada - "1st International Conference on Global Warming and the Next Ice Age" Aug 19 - 24, 2001

- South Africa "Greenland Dialogue" Aug 16-19, 2005

- Montreal, Canada Nov 28 - Dec 9, 2005 (189 countries, more than 10,000 people)

- Miami, FL - "17th Global Warming International Conference and Expo" - April 20 - 21, 2006

- Nairobi, Kenya - "United Nations Conference on Climate Change" November 6 - 17, 2006 (6,000 participants from 180 countries)

- Valencia, Spain - Nov 12, 2007 (Delegates from 140 nations)

- Iceland "5th Icelandic Model United Nations Conference" Oct 24 - 28, 2007

- Bali, Indonesia -Dec 3-14, 2007 (More than 10,000 participants)

- Istanbul, Turkey "Global Conference on Global Warming 2008" - July 6 - 10, 2008

- Bonn, Germany - Technical talks to prepare for later talks in Copenhagen (You can't fly and talk about cutting carbon dioxide emissions too much) - March 27, 28, 2009

- Washington, D.C. "Major Economies Forum on Energy and Climate - late April, 2009

- La Maddalena, Italy - July 2009

- Copenhagen, Denmark - December, 2009

Thousands more conferences to reduce travel and carbon dioxide emissions.
It is like gorging on food to lose weight.


http:// www.conferencealerts.com/environment.htm

------------------------------------------------

These increases in carbon dioxide concentration do not produce the increases in temperature which is presented so fearfully by "greens".

_________________________
Voodoo Environmentalism



The Global Warming Scam is the biggest political and economic power grab ever attempted. The Left’s desire to hamstring the U.S. economy and force worldwide Kyoto Treaty compliance will, according to one United Nations estimate, cost the world economy 53 trillion this century.

Al Gore may be a comical dupe when it comes to climatology (in college, he collected a C+ and a D in his two natural-sciences courses), but the global-warming debate and the consequences of that debate are serious. To participate meaningfully, one must distinguish between fact and fiction - in addition to understanding the underlying political agendas.

Richard S. Lindzen, Professor of Atmospheric Science at MIT, writes, “A general characteristic of Mr. Gore’s approach is to assiduously ignore the fact that the earth and its climate are dynamic; they are always changing even without any external forcing. To treat all change as something to fear is bad enough; to do so in order to exploit that fear is much worse.”
Perhaps worse still is Gore’s intellectual cowardice. During his visit to Europe in January, Gore agreed to an interview with Denmark’s largest national newspaper, Jyllands-Posten. Then, when he learned that Bjorn Lomborg, one of the world’s leading critics of eco-theological dogma, was also going to be interviewed, Gore abruptly canceled.

Lomborg, a statistician, has delved deep into the data to expose the environmental movement’s selective and oft-misleading use of evidence. His book, “The Skeptical Environmentalist” was hailed by Washington Post Book World as “a magnificent achievement” and “the most significant work on the environment since the appearance of its polar opposite, Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring, in 1962.” Perhaps a thoughtful debate is what scares Al Gore most of all. - PatriotPost.org
--------------------------------------

"It doesn’t matter what’s true; it only matters what people believe is true."
Paul Watson, Co-founder of Greenpeace

"The threat of a new ice age must now stand alongside nuclear war as a likely source of wholesale death and misery for mankind." - Environmentalist Nigel Calder at the first Earth Day

Before we mothball our cars and industrial engines to reduce the 5% of greenhouse gases which are man-made, we ought to consider the following:

1. "The satellite record of planetary temperatures, which is by far the most accurate way to measure global temperature, shows a slight cooling trend since the record began in 1979". Robert Balling, Jr., director of the Office of Climatology at Arizona State University.
2. "Most scientists now accept the fact that actual observations from earth satellites show no climate warming whatsoever." The Leipzig Declaration, signed in November, 1995 by a panel of prominent scientists.
3. The United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) claimed "a consensus view" that global warming was occurring. Frederick Seitz, former president of Rockefeller University lashed out at IPCC. He said, "In my more than 60 years as a member of the American scientific community, including service as president of both the National Academy of Sciences and the American Physical Society, I have never witnessed a more disturbing corruption of the peer review process than the events that led to this IPCC report".
4. According to IPCC, global warming might cost the United States 1.5% of gross domestic product. However the Institute for International Economics calculated that the cost of cutting emissions by one-third would be 3.5% of world-wide GDP. So the costs of such "environmentalism" would be more than double the benefits!
5. DRI/McGraw Hill estimates that taxes and restrictions to reduce global "warming’ could cost 600,000 U.S. jobs.
So long as it doesn't cost Kendrick's, I'm quite sure he doesn't care.
The U.S. Senate, by a vote of 95-0, passed a resolution last July demanding that any new climate treaty will also obligate developing nations. Repressive regimes in China, North Korea, Iraq, and elsewhere pursue policies which imprison or kill their own citizens by the thousands. They certainly could not be expected to honor any climate treaty, even if they were to sign one. Congress demanded that Americans should not pick up the tab for such countries. Clinton/Gore "environmentalists" say otherwise to tax us more and control us more in the name of dishonesty. The accompanying graph shows that earth’s temperature is largely a function of sunspot activity.
Rationing of fuel by any means will lower standards of living and inconvenience all who are affected. There are many other forms of Voodoo Environmentalism, but global warming stands out for two reasons. First, it is the most deceitful (and the competition is keen). Second, its "cure" promises to cost us more than any other environmental "fix". (That competition too is keen.) Fight the voodoo with facts and common sense.
--------------------------------------------

The Hockey Stick Graph is a Scam

http://www.uoguelph.ca/~rmckitri/research/McKitrick-hockeystick.pdf


----------------------------------------------

 Pathological Science and the Hockey Stick

“Richard (Betts), I can't answer for our host, but you have to remember why some of us got involved in the climate wars in the first place.

“For me this has never really been about climate itself. I don't find climate particularly interesting it's one of those worthy but tedious branches of science which under normal circumstances I would happily leave to other people who like that sort of thing. My whole involvement has always been driven by concerns about the corruption of science.

“Like many people I was dragged into this by the Hockey Stick. I was looking up some minor detail about the Medieval Warm Period and discovered this weird parallel universe of people who apparently didn't believe it had happened, and even more bizarrely appeared to believe that essentially nothing had happened in the world before the twentieth century. The Hockey Stick is an extraordinary claim which requires extraordinary evidence, so I started reading round the subject. And it soon became clear that the first extraordinary thing about the evidence for the Hockey Stick was how extraordinarily weak it was, and the second extraordinary thing was how desperate its defenders were to hide this fact. I'd always had an interest in pathological science, and it looked like I might have stumbled across a really good modern example.

“You can't spend long digging around the Hockey Stick without stumbling across other areas of climate science pathology. The next one that really struck me was the famous Phil Jones quote: 'Why should I make the data available to you, when your aim is to try and find something wrong with it?' To any practising scientist that's a huge red flag. Sure we all feel a bit like that on occasion, but to actually say something like that in an email is practically equivalent to getting up on a public platform and saying 'I'm a pathological scientist, and I'm proud.' “– Jonathan Jones, Physics Professor, Oxford University
______________________________________________________________

The Disgraceful Episode Of Lysenkoism Brings Us Global Warming Theory

Peter Ferrara, March 28, 2013 - Forbes Magazine

http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterferrara/2013/04/28/the-disgraceful-episode-of-lysenkoism-brings-us-global-warming-theory/


Please click on "Older Post" link below right for much, much more of the Global Warming Scam.