“Today’s debate about global warming is essentially a debate about freedom. The environmentalists would like to mastermind each and every possible (and impossible) aspect of our lives.” - Vaclav Klaus Blue Planet in Green Shackles

For the last three years, satellite-measured average global temperature has been declining. Given the occurrence also of record low winter temperatures and massive snowfalls across both hemispheres this year, IPCC members have now entered panic mode, the whites of their eyes being clearly visible as they seek to defend their now unsustainable hypothesis of dangerous, human-caused global warming. ~ Professor Robert M. Carter, Marine Geophysical Laboratory at James Cook University, Australia
www.canadapress.com, March 25, 2008


Greenhouse Gas Diagrams
Click on it to enlarge


3.4% of 3.62% is 0.12308%. For this negligible amount, many would control your very lives, and impose upon you and your family a(nother) huge tax burned.







"If we all worked on the assumption that what is accepted as true is really true, there would be little hope of advance." - Orville Wright


There is no "scientific consensus," as global warming advocates often claim. Nor is consensus important to science. Galileo may have been the only man of his day who believed the earth revolved around the sun, but he was right! - Unstoppable Global Warming, Every 1500 Years, by Fred Singer, page 6

"There is no evidence that carbon dioxide increases are having any effect whatsoever on the climate. If you examine every single proposition of the IPCC thoroughly, you find that the science somewhere fails.... not only from the data, but it fails in the statistics, and the mathematics. (As new science, true costs and political obstacles are better understood) combating global warming may become just another inconsequential political platitude, as evidence increasingly indicates it should." - Dr. Vincent Gray, who shares in IPCC's recent Nobel Prize as an expert reviewer on every draft of the IPCC studies since 1990


The Senate Minority Report, a challenge by 650 scientists to the Global Warming Scam


http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=2674E64F-802A-23AD-490B-BD9FAF4DCDB7


Harvard-Smithsonian
Center for Astrophysics Press Release

Release No.: 03-10
For Release: March 31, 2003

20th Century Climate Not So Hot


Cambridge, MA - A review of more than 200 climate studies led by researchers at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics has determined that the 20th century is neither the warmest century nor the century with the most extreme weather of the past 1000 years.

______________________________________

ClimateGate - Britain's East SYSTEMATIC suppression and discrediting of climate skeptics' views and discarding of temperature data

FOIGate - East Anglia committed a crime by refusing to release global warming documents sought in 95 Freedom of Information Act requests

ChinaGate - an investigation by the U.K.s left-wing Guardian newspaper found evidence that Chinese weather station measurements were not only seriously flawed but also couldn't be located

HimalayaGate - An Indian climate official admitted in January that, as lead authority of the IPCC's Asian report, he intentionally exaggerated wehn claiming Himalayan glaciers would melt away by 2035

PachauriGate - Rajendra Pachauri, the IPCC chairman who accepted the Nobel Prize with Al Gore for scaring people, first defended the Himalaya melting scenario. Critics, he said, practiced "voodoo science." Later Pachauri admitted making a mistake, but we should still trust him.

PachauriGate II - Pachauri also claimed he didn't know before the 192 nation climate summit in Copenhagen that the bogus Himalayan glacier claim was sheer speculation. He lied. Pachauri "decided to overlook it" claiming he was "preoccupied."

Is this how *science* is supposed to work? Lies, scams, and one misrepresentation after another, without skippiing a beat in continuing the promotion of what has clearly become a charade?

Anyone failing to march in lockstep with this *science* is instantly brandeda scientific heretic.

SternGate - the U.K.'s 2006 Stern Report claimed that southern Australia lost rainfall because of rising ocean temperatures, and northwest Australia has had stronger typhoons in recent decades.

These claims have since been deleted.

SternGate II - researcher Robert Muirwood said his original work was misquoted in the Stern Report. He accused Stern of "going far beyond what was an acceptable extrapolation of the evidence."

AmazonGate - the IPCC claim that global warming will wipe out rain forests was fraudulent, yet advanced as "peer-reviewed science". It actually came from an unsubstantiated claim by green campaigners and was lifted from a report from the World Wildlife Fund which looked at the impact of logging and burning.

PeerReviewGate - The U.K. Sunday Telegraph has documented at least 16 nonpeer-reviewed reports from the World Wildlife Fund that were used in the IPCC's climate change bible

RussiaGate - readings from the coldest regions of Russia had been omitted from East Anglia's research material, driving up average temperatures about half a degree

RussiaGateII - tree ring data from Russia showed cooling after 1961, but was deceptively truncated and spun in IPCC publications.

U.S.Gate - the U.S. National Climate Data Center has been manipulating weather data, say computer expert E. Michael Smith and meteorologist Joseph D'Aleo. Forty years ago, there were 6,000 surface-temperature measuring stations, but only 1,500 by 1990. Most of the deleted stations were in colder regions.

*Science*

IceGate - the IPCC based its findings of reductions in mountain ice in the Andes, Alps, and in Africa on a feature story in a popular mountaineering magazine

ResearchGate - Penn State University found "further investigation is warranted" on Michael Mann's climate research improprieties. Mann engaged in actions that "seriously deviated from accepted practices for proposing, conducting or reporting research or other scholarly activities."

ReefGate - the IPCC cited not peer-reviewed literature but advocacy articles by Greenpeace as its sole source for coral reef degradation

AfricaGate - the IPCC claim that rising temperatures could cut in half agricultural yields in African countries came from a 2003 paper by a Canadian environmental think tank, not a peer-reviewed scientific journal

DutchGate - the IPCC said rising sea levels endanger the 55 percent of the Netherlands it says is below sea level. The portion of the Netherlands below sea level is actually 20 percent.

AlaskaGate - geologists for Space Studies in Geophysics and Oceanography and their U.S. and Canadian colleagues say previous studies largely overestimated by 40 percent Alaskan glacier loss for 40 years. These flawed data are fed into computers to predict future warming.

www.ocregister.com